The procedure tag has never accepted a parameterClass as the schema shows it. I will modify the code to remove it.
On 11/16/06, Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Today I (think I) grabbed the latest version from SVN. The schema no longer requires a paramterMap. While looking through the source it appears that the Procedure class has also been modified to accept a parameterClass. However SqlMap.xsd has not been updated to allow parameterClass. Am I correct or did I not get the latest file? On 11/16/06, Gilles Bayon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's in SVN > > On 11/15/06, Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Are there any plans to change the schema so that a parameter map is not required for a stored procedure? > > > > > > ------------------ > > From: Oddur Snær Magnússon [mailto:[EMAIL <%5BEMAIL> > > PROTECTED] > > Sent: Mon 7/24/2006 10:11 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: Problem calling stored procedure having no parameter > > > > > > > > > > I got around it by having an empty parametermap > > > > <parameterMaps> > > <parameterMap id="noparams"></parameterMap> > > </parameterMaps> > > > > And then using that in the <procedure> statement: > > > > > > > > <procedure id="GetAllSomething" parameterMap="noparams" > > resultMap="SomeThing">sprocName</procedure> > > > > I think that's the only solution since the parameterMap attribute is required > > > > on the procedure element. > > > > - Oddur > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Gilles > > <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/6JCP7AORB0LE ">Wish List</a> >
-- Cheers, Gilles <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/6JCP7AORB0LE";>Wish List</a>
