AWESOME On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Yaojian <sky...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess the original idea is allow a user to customize the IDataMapper > implementation class. > But the DefaultConfigurationEngine instantiate the DataMapper instance in a > non-virtual method. > > If we can add a DataMapperClass property in the ConfigurationSetting class, > such as the ConfigurationSetting.SessionFactory does, we can make this work. > > By the way, I wrote some notes about the V3 configuration process: > > http://sites.google.com/site/ibatisnetinside/Home/DataMapperConfiguring > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Michael McCurrey <mmccur...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I have no clue. I'm still wresting with with large scale changes between >> 1 and 3. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Yaojian <sky...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The Apache.Ibatis.DataMapper.DefaultMapperFactory does not implement the >>> IMapperFactory.GetMapper<TInterface>(); >>> >>> so the only way AFAIK to get the IDataMapper is to use a type cast as: >>> >>> IMapperFactory mapperFactory = >>> configurationEngine.BuildMapperFactory(); >>> IDataMapper dataMapper = >>> ((IDataMapperAccessor)mapperFactory).DataMapper; //since GetInterface<T> >>> has not been implemented. >>> >>> Any one have idea about what the GetInterface<T> intend to be? >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Michael J. McCurrey >> Read with me at http://www.mccurrey.com >> > > -- Michael J. McCurrey Read with me at http://www.mccurrey.com
