Yep, I read it as Maximum Prefix recommendation. The number also used by SIX [1] to set as maximum-prefix in their route-servers
Thank you Budiwijaya [1] https://www.seattleix.net/participants/ On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Job Snijders <j...@instituut.net> wrote: > To answer my own question: > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:40:47AM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: >> If we look at a record like https://peeringdb.com/net/1045, what do the >> values behind "IPv4 Prefixes" (250000) and "IPv6 prefixes" (25000) >> actually mean? > > I'd like it to mean "This is what NTT generally recommends as the > maximum prefix limit on EBGP sessions where you expect NTT to announce > their customer cone", so that the listed values can be used verbatim in > provisioning systems. > > Kind regards, > > Job > _______________________________________________ > User-discuss mailing list > User-discuss@lists.peeringdb.com > http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-discuss _______________________________________________ User-discuss mailing list User-discuss@lists.peeringdb.com http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-discuss