There is a property that is earmarked to show more info, but it has yet to be implemented.
This has been at the top of my wish list for some time now, too.
Just too much other crap in front of it I guess. ;-)
Larry
On 7/22/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I read that thread. Unfortunately, there don't exist many unit
tests that directly test the correctness of the iBATIS queries. All
the queries have been approved by DBA and are supposed to be correct.
Actually, my question is not to test the correctness of the iBATIS
queries, but to test these:
1. Whether the getter/setter methods of the resultClass has changed.
2. Whether the ParameterClass, resultClass has been renamed.
3. Whether the setter/getters are overloaded.
...
Thanks a lot.
Bing
On 7/22/05, Ed Griebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This exact question was asked yesterday or Wednesday, you can probably
> find the thread in the archive.
>
> -ed
>
> On 7/22/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are doing a lot of refactoring and one issue came up was that
> > moving JavaBean, renaming or overloading setter/getters could break
> > the existing iBATIS queries. But we have to wait till runtime and test
> > every related functionality for that purpose.
> >
> > I am wondering whether there is a way we could perform this kind of
> > validation in advance?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Bing
> >
>
