the mapping is taking quite a long time for us that's why i'm asking the question, just wondering has anyone else encountered a similar problem
--- Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm...I'll need to set up a template with a canned > answer for this. > > Generic benchmarks are useless. You'll get full > agreement from any open > source team (like Hibernate), and you may get a > mixed response from > commercial vendors like oracle. > > The only benchmarks and tests that matter are those > that you do in your own > environment that adequately represent your needs. > > Cheers, > Clinton > > > On 2/9/06, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I am not aware of a comprehensive comparison of > ORM frameworks. > > However, iBatis would likely not be a part of > that. We are not an > > Object-Relational-Mapping framework. We are SQL > Mapping framework and > > value based. Not Table and Object ID based like > ORM. That said... you > > WOULD be able to categorize us correctly as a > "persistence" framework. > > > > Also, in what case would you be returning a > million objects in a java > > application? > > > > On 2/8/06, a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi, is there articles that compare the orm > mappers out > > > there for mapping performance? i.e. after i get > a > > > query result how long does it take to generate > the > > > object, and what if the resultset is like a > million of > > > records > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
