Gentlemen:
I do
thank you and believe you have a fine thing going. Like I said I created a very
clean little design that basically uses the xml objects emitted by iBATIS and
transforms them anyway you want (great for little docs). I'd like to see stuff
move a little forward -- I'll help!!!
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: When returning mutiple objects and transforming "directly to xml
From: Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: When returning mutiple objects and transforming "directly to xml
Hi Bill,
It will probably go away in version 3.0. We'd never remove a feature from the current major version. It will continue to be supported in 2.0.
In it's place we'll likely either suggest or build-in second stage xml support, for turning classes, beans and maps into XML. That will allow you to map them to domain objects AND convert them to XML. Plus, there are already a number of XML libraries that support exactly that. The current implementation creates too much complexity in the implementation, yet offers little additonal value over the formerly described approach.
Don't worry though, we'll always help you upgrade. Even if it doesn't exist in 3.0, we'll have a suggested upgrade path that shouldn't leave you floundering.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 6/2/06, Morone,
Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Larry,
Really? I think it bears great merit. I little expansion would make it really practical. In fact hearing of its departure has me a little worried.
Does this mean the resultClass="xml" is going away?
I created a little (restlet front-end) framework that translates the xml output for web services. I extended ArrayList to deal with the "non-webformedness" of the queryForObject "list of little docs" situation and it works great.
Our system is scheduled to go into production in October -- what are the future plans for the xml stuff -- I assume we'll have to subclass to extend. Will your superclass stuff stay the same?
Bill Morone
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Larry Meadors
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: When returning mutiple objects and transforming "directly
to xml
On 6/1/06, Morone, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coming soon, right?
On the contrary, going away.
I'd suggest processing the results of the query manually to create XML
with a row handler if you really need to create xml results.
Larry
This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the recipient(s)
named above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
destroy or delete the original message. Also, please be aware that if you are not
the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or any
action or reliance based on this message is prohibited by law.
This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy or delete the original message. Also, please be aware that if you are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action or reliance based on this message is prohibited by law.
