On 8/17/06, Jeff Butler <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm...jdbcType is needed. Some of the tests fail if I remove it (columns that are JDBC DATE or TIME are problems).I'm interested to see if adding the javaType makes any difference - I'm thinking maybe a slight performance difference. I'll try it and let you know.Jeff Butler
On 8/17/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Not now. Is there some reason you need this? I think that the jdbcType is extraneous in these mappings too - best to let iBATIS do the type magic that it does so well.With the next version of Abator you'll be able to specify a type handler if you need to override the iBATIS default behavior.Jeff Butler
On 8/17/06, Mississippi John Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi,
Is it possible to get Abator to generate the "javaType=" clause in the sql.xml resultmap definitions? Thanks.
