Hmm, it's been years since I used the display: tags, but I think you
could use a decorator for that case - look in the docs for the
display: tags for examples.

Larry

On 10/11/06, Ou, Stan (Mission Systems) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply, Larry.

In the jsp, we also use displaytag to display if it's a listing, so not
sure if the <fmt:> tag could fit in, but will give it a try.  The
displaytag syntax is as follow:

<display:table id="aList" name="aList" pagesize="25"
requestURI="/shr.gcss">
        <display:column property="someDate" title="Some Date" />


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Larry Meadors
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Date format conversion to/from db

Make your beans use java.util.Date.

Use <fmt:*> jsp tags for output.

In your forms, pick a date format, then on the backend, do the
conversion from string to date - spring does most of that for you, IIRC.

Larry


On 10/11/06, Ou, Stan (Mission Systems) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've an application that integrates Spring and iBatis with an Oracle
> backend.  We were using Oracle's bc4j before we made the switch.
> Since our dates are persisted to the db in a different format from
> what we display on the jsp, what would be the best approach to do the
> conversion?  The most straightforward way I think is use a util class
> to do the conversion in the getter/setter of the pojo but I'll have to

> make the pojo's setter smart enough to know whether I'm reading from
> the db or being bound to a form by Spring, something along this line:
>
> If reading from db for display on jsp
>   convert from db to gui format
>
> If being bound to Spring form and then persisted to db
>   convert from gui to db format
>
> The same goes for the getter.
>
> Our pojos are auto generated, so any logic added will get wiped out if

> someone regenerates the pojo.
> Can anyone shed some lights on this?  Any suggestions are welcomed.
Thanks.
>
> Stan

Reply via email to