Something like

public Account(String id) {
   if(getSession().getUser().hasPermission(getClass(), id))
       this.id = id;
   else
       throws new PermissionDenyException();
}


On 1/9/07, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you maybeprovide some pseudo-ode for what you are trying to do
that would require access to a result set?

I am totally not seeing it.

Larry


On 1/8/07, Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is kind of surprise me, I thought this is a common use case to
> implement role permission. However look like this is not the case.
>
> In fact I just do it this way in my last application as we write DAO
> ourselves without any tools. May be you can share how ibatis user
> commonly do for role permission?
>
> On 1/9/07, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ACK!!! Sorry, my bad.  It wasn't RowHandler.  It was the custom
> > TypeHandlerCallback.  ResultGetter now exposes the ResultSet.
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion and my unclear brain before my Starbucks Grande
> > Half-Sweet Vanilla Americano with room.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Clinton
> >
> > On 1/8/07, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hmm, RowHandler is clear of java.sql references - as it should be.
> > >
> > > There are some ResultSet references passed around in the type handler
> > > extension points..
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/8/07, Clinton Begin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Except for that new method Larry added to the RowHandler APIs...you can
> > now
> > > > get the original ResultSet while the rows are being returned from within
> > a
> > > > RowHandler.
> > > >
> > > > But other than that very isolated case, Brandon is right, you can't just
> > > > arbitrarily get the ResultSet and do with it as you please.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Clinton
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/8/07, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > No you cannot get a ResultSet. iBATIS will not at anytime from
> > anywhere
> > > > provide you a reference to the ResultSet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Brandon
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/8/07, Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Just really read
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > 
http://ibatis.apache.org/docs/java/dev/com/ibatis/sqlmap/client/event/RowHandler.html
> > > > > > , However can I get the resultset from the RowHandler?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 1/8/07, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Sounds like you can use a RowHandler for this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Brandon
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 1/7/07, Carfield Yim < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Actually I get I cannot do... but anyway, just ask.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For method
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > 
http://ibatis.apache.org/docs/java/dev/com/ibatis/sqlmap/engine/mapping/result/ResultObjectFactory.html#createInstance(java.lang.String,
> > > > > > > > java.lang.Class)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > instead of having
> > > > > > > > public Object ResultObjectFactory(String id, Class clazz) {
> > > > > > > >     Constructor con = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(new
> > > > > > > Class[]{String.class});
> > > > > > > >     return con.newInstance(objectStaticAvailable);
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can I init the object using resultset result, like
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > public Object ResultObjectFactory(String id, ResultSet rs, Class
> > > > clazz) {
> > > > > > > >     Constructor con = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(new
> > > > > > > Class[]{ String.class});
> > > > > > > >     return con.newInstance(rs.getString("id"));
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So that I can use the ID of the record to check for permission
> > when
> > > > > > > > initalization. If the user don't have permission to load that
> > > > record,
> > > > > > > > the system will throw an exception and we will show an generic
> > > > > > > > permission deny page.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 1/8/07, Brandon Goodin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I'm not completely sure what you are asking. But, if you are
> > > > asking if
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > can get the ResultSet itself that would be a no. iBATIS is
> > JDBC
> > > > wrapper.
> > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > you find that you need more direct access to JDBC then you
> > should
> > > > use
> > > > > > > JDBC
> > > > > > > > > directly.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Brandon
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 1/7/07, Carfield Yim < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Can I get the reference of resultset when the object is
> > > > initalizating?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 1/8/07, Brandon Goodin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > You can find the javadoc here:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > 
http://ibatis.apache.org/docs/java/dev/com/ibatis/sqlmap/engine/mapping/result/ResultObjectFactory.html
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I was assuming you were wanting to map result values to a
> > > > > > > constructor.
> > > > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > > > you are trying to map results to a constructor, it would
> > seem
> > > > a
> > > > > > > tedious
> > > > > > > > > > > effort to use the ResultObjectFactory for this.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I know it is lame that we don't have this functionality.
> > But,
> > > > we've
> > > > > > > > > > > discussed adding the constructor mapping functionality and
> > > > have
> > > > > > > decided
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > is best to delay adding it until iB3 (no eta).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Brandon
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 1/7/07, Carfield Yim < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I just check for the document and I cannot see those
> > APIs ,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > http://ibatis.apache.org/docs/java/user/ ,
> > > > am I
> > > > > > > > > looking
> > > > > > > > > > > for wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > thing?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/8/07, Goga, Murtaza < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you considered using an implementation of
> > > > > > > ResultObjectFactory?
> > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > can be configured within iBatis or injected into the
> > > > > > > > > SqlMapExecutorDelegate.
> > > > > > > > > > >  Either ways you will have control over the creation and
> > > > subsequent
> > > > > > > > > > > initialization of objects.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Peng Wang [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Sun 1/7/2007 9:26 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Can ibatis work with java object with
> > > > constructor
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > parameters?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You can do this using Spring. I think iBatis does not
> > have
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/8/07, Carfield Yim < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         To bad to hear that, is it planned to be
> > > > implemented?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         On 1/8/07, Brandon Goodin <
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         > This is not currently implemented.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         > Brandon
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         > On 1/6/07, Carfield Yim < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         > > I like to pass something to the object
> > while
> > > > > > > > > initalization,
> > > > > > > > > > > can I
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         > > specific about that?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to