It's pluggable anyway, so we don't need to choose! :-)
iBATIS 3.0 will change the approach we take to plugins. We'll probably host plugins somewhere else and open up the access to the code more than the core. Clinton On 7/10/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd rather like to see if there's anything comparing EHCache with JCS, as http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/JCSvsEHCache.html makes some fairly significant claims about JCS being better. /Gwyn On Tuesday, July 10, 2007, 3:57:31 AM, Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The cache model is one part of the architecture that is already > pluggable. You could write a plugin today to use it. > I do agree. I know the developer of EHCache (smart guy) and I believe > it's under an Apache compatible license too. > Cheers, > Clinton > On 7/9/07, Jiming Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I filled the survery, but forgot fill a suggestion. >> >> What do you guys think using EHCache take place of OSCache in next version? >> I think EHCache is more clear and powerful than OSCache and some benchmarks >> say EHCache is much faster. BTW, Spring use EHCache by default.
