Point taken. We apologize if this causes you distress. But, we have attained
the data that we wanted. We all feel the need for all the features we can
get and we will certainly not leave out key features. I'm sure your concerns
will be addressed as we dig into the next generation iBATIS.
Thanks,
Brandon Goodin
On 7/11/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2007, 5:32:46 PM, Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Exactly. The random selection is more meaningful than a multiple
selection.
> But I really have a hard time believing that there's NO primary for
> each of those categories.
For most of them, yes, but for some, e.g.
6) a,d
8) b,d,e
12) e,f
then I can't really differentiate (and have no idea which I actually went
for!)
/Gwyn
