Thanks, I already looked at an example and dont think it will fit our requirements. we plan on using HashMaps.
On Dec 18, 2007 7:42 PM, Brian Parkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bharaat. > > I am using a RowHandler to map the results to a Java object, and then > post-process the list of objects to create the final result - a way to > filter or combine results - I'm not sure exactly what you are doing, so > unsure if this is a fit. > > The iBATIS SQL Maps for Java developer guide at > > http://ibatis.apache.org/javadownloads.cgi > > contains an example. > > I believe that returning a Map is fastest (less introspection) but if > you want to get objects and the do some work on these, a row handler > might fit the bill. > > Cheers, > > parki... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bhaarat Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 3:53 PM > To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org > > Subject: Re: way to get resultSet as a list w/out putting data in class > > hi, > > do you have an example of rowHandler implementation? > > will that be more effecient than HashMaps? and how will we retrieve > results in the java code. > > w/ hashMap we can just do map.get(\"propertyName\"); > On 12/18/07, Brian Parkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi - > > > > One may might be to implement a row handler. > > > > parki... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:44 PM > > To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org > > Subject: way to get resultSet as a list w/out putting data in class > > > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to convert resultSet code to use iBatis. > > > > I know in iBatis the results are put in a class and returned as a > > collection of those classes. But my code has a lot of logic in which > > we are iterating over the resultset and there are lots of conditional > > (if/else)statements. > > > > I am wondering if there is a way to get the results from iBatis as a > > simple plain list. > > So I can treat the returned list from iBatis as a resultSet basically. > > > > Thanks! > > > -- -bhaarat
