This has been added quite some time ago, but I can't find it either. I've checked the release notes and issue tracker, but no luck.
Niels -----Original Message----- From: André B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:04 AM To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Subject: Re: Support for private properties Hi. I can't find any information about if the support for private properties has been added. Does anyone know? André Clinton Begin wrote: > > These are all good suggestions, but they're all workarounds.... > > There's really no reason we shouldn't support private properties. I do > believe it's fairly simple, but realize that it may require that you > enable > certain JVM security parameters. > > I'll make the change in SVN for 2.2.0. > > Cheers, > Clinton > > > On 8/9/06, Eric T. Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Ben. I had never thought to try that. We'll look into that >> solution as well. >> >> >> On 8/9/06, Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> > >> > Give your domain objects a method that takes a Map (or a convenience >> > helper class that >> > wraps the map) and sets private variables appropriately. You can have >> > ibatis map the >> > result set right into the Map and have your DAO pass it into the domain >> > object. >> > >> > I'm doing that on my current project and it's working fine. >> > Unfortunately I've also found >> > that not exposing setters does not mean you won't still create >> > brain-splitting complexity, >> > but that's another story. >> > >> > b >> > >> > Eric T. Blue wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > My company is currently investigating the best strategy for not >> > exposing >> > > certain getters/setters for a number of our classes in our domain >> > > model. These objects end up being exposed through SOAP, and many >> > > getters/setters are only there to satisfy bean-compliance (public >> > > getters/setters). Although we still need the properties to >> save/fetch >> > > data, they have no real meaning to the developers that are using the >> > > public API. We are leaning against our business layer creating >> > another >> > > set of value objects/DTOs that hide these properties. But, we need >> to >> > > find out other alternatives. >> > > >> > > Is there support for mapping to private properties in new versions of >> > > the Java mapper? I was browsing through the .net JIRA and came >> across >> > >> > > this feature request: >> > > >> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATISNET-153 >> > > >> > > I suppose the other alternative is to find out if Axis can exclude >> > > certain properties when stubs are generated. However, I"m not >> certain >> > > if this is possible either. Thanks. >> > >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Support-for-private-properties-tp5731710p16323334.html Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
