FWIW, I got as far as "COMPLEX", "A_GROUP", and "B_GROUP" before I stopped reading. ;-)
I'm not saying no one else will read or answer you, just that I think if you can make this a more concrete example, instead of a tuple calculus exercise, then you might get more (and better) responses. Larry On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:02 AM, mailjoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > We have a ComplexObject made of one instance of aGroup and one instance of > bGroup. > The aGroup is made of a collection of A instances. > The bGroup is made of a colleciton of B instances. > > We have one SQL Map for aGroup, and another one for bGroup. > > If aGroup contains m A's and bGroup contains n B's, the query given below > returns m*n items in the aGroup and bGroup properties: > > <resultMap class="ComplexObject" id="result" groupBy="id, aGroupId, > bGroupId"> > <result property="id" column="COMPLEX.OBJECT_ID" /> > <result property="aGroup" column="COMPLEX.A_GROUP_ID" > resultMap="aGroup.result" /> > <result property="bGroup" column="COMPLEX.B_GROUP_ID" > resultMap="bGroup.result" /> > </resultMap> > > <select id="getById" resultMap="result"> > SELECT * FROM COMPLEX > INNER JOIN A_GROUP ON A_GROUP_ID = A_GROUP.ID > INNER JOIN A ON A.GROUP_ID = A_GROUP_ID > INNER JOIN B_GROUP ON B_GROUP_ID = B_GROUP.ID > INNER JOIN B ON B.GROUP_ID = B_GROUP_ID > WHERE COMPLEX.ID = #value# > </select> > > Any idea how to fix this bug? > > Thanks! > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Duplicates-when-trying-to-avoid-N%2B1-selects-tp18404580p18404580.html > Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >