I think we stopped comparing performance metrics about 4 years ago. :-) Generally speaking:
* iBATIS has better query and load performance, from SQL to Object. * Hibernate has a better caching subsystem made possible by the additional information it has about the table/class mappings. Both support batch updates and join mapping. Any differences in the actual framework code will be marginal compared to the cost of accessing the database itself. So different applications will perform very differently and some will benefit from iBATIS and others from Hibernate. They aren't directly comparable. Clinton On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:48 AM, mule_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is any metrics avialble on performance comparisons between iBatis and > Hibernate 3.2, or 3.x and above? > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Performance-metrics-between-iBatis-and-Hibernate-3.2%2C-or-3.x-and-above-tp18893258p18893258.html > Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
