Kai Grabfelder-2 wrote: > > I think your development efficiency will increase as you'll probably have > faster deployment/development cycles without all the ejb overhead. In > terms of runtime / production performance I don't think that a pure tomcat > setup is that much faster - but it will consume a lot less of resources - > thats for sure. >
Cutting those deployment/development cycles is the major focus of OpenEJB and something we're bringing to the EJB 3.1 spec. We want EJB to be as easy to develop/test as any other plain java object with no exceptions. I think we do extremely well at it. Here's a blog from a newer user who was pretty shocked and amazed that developing EJBs could actually be... dare I say *enjoyable*. http://qbeukes.blogspot.com/2008/08/rapid-ejb-development-with-unit-tests.html -David -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/iBATIS-with-Tomcat-vs-JBoss-tp20313042p20472759.html Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
