+5 I vote +5 for this. We are looking forward to use SQLJ in our enterprise application.
Jeff Butler-2 wrote: > > I took a quick look at the SQL code that was sent recently. Is this > the proposed implementation? As far as I can tell, the proposed > implementation takes an existing set of SqlMap files and translates > them to SQLJ files. So the workflow is this: > > 1. Write iBATIS Sql maps > 2. Generate SQLJ from those maps > 3. Use the modified iBATIS JAR to execute *some*, and only *some* of > that code with SQLJ rather than JDBC. > > The SQLJ executer will fallback to regular iBATIS (JDBC) if there is > any dynamic element in an SQL map statement (and under some other > conditions too - I can't remember exactly which right now). So you > still have to have JDBC setup, the executor just switches to SQLJ for > some of the statements. > > This seems like an unusual work flow to me. What's the benefit? > > Also, the code that was sent included the IBM DB2 driver, certainly > not open source, and we have no legal right to redistribute. I don't > know if that was required or was just included as a convenience. > > So, I'm -1 based on the implementation I've seen. > > Jeff Butler > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Clinton Begin <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> A group of developers have approached us with a contribution of code >> to patch iBATIS so that it supports SQLJ. >> >> If you've never heard of SQLJ, here are two links... >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLJ >> http://www.google.com/trends?q=sqlj >> >> The future of SQLJ is not clear to me, nor is its adoption rate over >> time. Certainly iBATIS has a broader user base than SQLJ does. >> >> So the question is: Should we support SQLJ as a feature of iBATIS? >> >> +5 == Absolutely... iBATIS will be better for it. >> +1 == Yes, support SQLJ. >> 0 == Doesn't matter to me. >> -1 == No, keep them separate. >> -5 == No way. iBATIS is better off without it. >> >> This vote will remain open for 72 hours. >> >> Cheers, >> Clinton >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Should-iBATIS-support-SQLJ--tp21630802p21679762.html Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
