I'm not convinced that slf4j is any better than the more widely used commons-logging. I know there are those who believe passionately on both sides of this discussion and I don't mean to berate anyone. If we want logging autonomy I'd rather go with what we did in the last version and simply implement an internal commons-logging-ish solution.
Brandon On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Cyril Pfaff <cyril.pf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for this amazing product. > > > > Currently, iBATIS3 currently depends on log4j. Even if I like log4j, It > would be interesting to look at SLF4J (http://www.slf4j.org/) as it may > offers more flexibility (Basically due to the fact that it's an abstraction > layer for various logging frameworks.) > > > I did not find anything interesting in the mail archive regarding this > subject: > > So ... what about slf4j ? Has this option already been discussed and > rejected internally, or is it possible to use this logging facility instead > of log4j in the next releases of iBATIS3 ?? > > Thanks again for your time. > Regards. > c.
