On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, stefcl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course v3 is beta, documentation might not be perfectly up to date,
> there's no user javadoc (or I could not find one) but if we're close to a
> release (are we?) I would prefer to start working directly with the new
> Ibatis API to avoid migrating code later.
FWIW, I was in the same position as you a few months ago - green field
development; didn't want to develop against an API that would soon
become out-dated; wanted to be using a version that people would be
enthusiastic about supporting.
I chose to go with the alphas, and yes - there were a few bugs, but
patches for actual bugs were accepted promptly. I haven't been
affected by any changes for a couple of beta iterations now (and I
have tests to verify), so things seem to be fairly stable.
Also, I found the iBATIS user guide is up-to-date. I think found one
thing that appeared to be out-of-date, and it was marked as such (no
idea if it's fixed now). For Javadoc, I just checked out the source,
and ran:
mvn javadoc:javadoc
... and dumped a copy on our local web server.
> Do you think v3 is stable enough? Can we expect a RC or stable release soon
> (1-3 months)? Any advice?
Up to you. If I were to do it again, I'd choose v3.
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
