Yep, I forgot the same syntax is used in annotations :) BTW, it was just a 2 cents idea, not a real proposal. Cheers, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Clinton Begin <clinton.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > The syntax will never be removed, first because it's the preferred way of > the majority, and second, because we need a parameter syntax that is > compatible with other configuration options, like annotations or JSON, etc. > > Clinton > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi all guys, >> sorry but I explained my "2 cents idea" in the wrong way :P >> Indeed, in my dreams, I'd completely _remove_ the #{} syntax, IMHO it >> should be simpler reading a 100% pure XML SQL map like: >> >> update ORDER_ENTRY.CONTACT >> set >> DEPT_ID = <parameter name="deptId" javaType="String" jdbcType="VARCHAR" >> /> >> STATE_ID = <parameter name="stateId" javaType="String" jdbcType="VARCHAR" >> /> >> TIME_ZONE_ID = <parameter name="timeZoneId" javaType="String" >> jdbcType="VARCHAR" /> >> >> instead of >> >> update ORDER_ENTRY.CONTACT >> set >> DEPT_ID = #{deptId, javaType=String, jdbcType=VARCHAR}, >> STATE_ID = #{stateId, javaType=String, jdbcType=VARCHAR}, >> TIME_ZONE_ID = #{timeZoneId, javaType=String, jdbcType=VARCHAR} >> >> even if, of course, for a simpler case like: >> >> insert into >> users ( >> id, >> username, >> password) >> values ( >> <parameter name="id"/>, >> <parameter name="username"/>, >> <parameter name="password"/> >> ) >> >> is much more verbose than: >> >> insert into >> users ( >> id, >> username, >> password) >> values ( >> #{id}, >> #{username}, >> #{password} >> ) >> >> Thoughts? >> All the best, >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Daryl Stultz <da...@6degrees.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Guy Rouillier <guyr-...@burntmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/3/2010 3:54 PM, Daryl Stultz wrote: >> > >> > >> >>> >> >>> I like this idea, though to keep things consistent, I would just use >> >>> "parameter" instead of "parameterDef". >> > >> > Right, I just made up parameterDef to indicate is was for defining the >> > parameter rather than using it. I'm pretty new to iBATIS, so I haven't >> > used >> > <parameter> yet and didn't want to suggest an orthogonal usage of it. >> > -- >> > Daryl Stultz >> > _____________________________________ >> > 6 Degrees Software and Consulting, Inc. >> > http://www.6degrees.com >> > mailto:da...@6degrees.com >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-java-unsubscr...@ibatis.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-java-h...@ibatis.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-java-unsubscr...@ibatis.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-java-h...@ibatis.apache.org
