In my case, it's a bit less code:
Mapper interface:
List<MyObject> getByCompoundKey(@Param("id1") Integer id1,
@Param("id2") Integer id2);
versus
Method in some class:
@SupressWarnings("unchecked")
List<MyObject> getByCompoundKey(Integer id2, Integer id2) {
Map parms = new HashMap();
parms.put("id1", id1);
parms.put("id2", id2);
return sqlSession.selectList("foo.Bar.getById", parms);
}
YMMV.
Jeff Butler
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Rick R <ric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jeff Butler <jeffgbut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Using a mapper interface means you have a bit less code to write
>
> How is it less code?, that's my whole point in dropping it since I think it
> adds more code (for in our case seemingly little gain.) All my sql is in xml
> and for every mapper xml statement I create I have to go over and add a
> Mapper interface method. It's just one more piece of code that needs
> attention.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-java-unsubscr...@ibatis.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-java-h...@ibatis.apache.org
