I actually did look at it - but I didn't like the API, and it seemed a bit
heavyweight for me. Simple lucene is enough for my needs, so I didn't add
that much of effort to get it running. Their forums aren't that active on
this topic either. Might take a second look though - thanks!

regards,
Andrius

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Ashok Madhavan <ashok.madha...@gmail.com>wrote:

> did you look at compass ( http://www.compass-project.org/).
>
> as per their documentation hey already have ibatis + lucene covered. (
> maybe it is ibatis 2.x ).
>
> regards
> ashok
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Andrius Juozapaitis <andri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Simone,
> > Thanks for the compliments, this functionality is by no means complete,
> and
> > it's currently a part of a reasonably proof-of-concept
> > (smartgwt-gwtrpcdatasource-gwtdispatcher (command pattern for
> gwt)-business
> > logic in spring/jms/aspects/springmvc/spring
> > security/etc-lucene-ibatis-postgres), but I already refactored it to a
> > number of smaller maven modules in a  multi-module maven project. I could
> > probably get rid of most of the persistence altogether and use hibernate,
> > but I still want to use the same domain objects in gwt and spring layers,
> > and hibernate kinda ruins the idea by enhancing the domain objects, so
> you
> > have to fallback to maintaining parallel hierarchies of DTOs and domain
> > objects - you get my drift :)
> > I could definately release at least this part of the project as an
> > opensource extension, no question about that, if only there's enough
> > interest for it, but I would still like to hear more oppinions about the
> > matter, before diving into implementation.
> > regards,
> > Andrius
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Simone Tripodi <
> simone.trip...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Andrius,
> >> very nice to meet you and congratulations for the idea, I fount it
> >> brilliant. These are just my 2 cents.
> >> generally speaking, I'd suggest you to implement the solution number
> >> 1: 1 interceptor and 1 annotation, nothing more, clear and reusable
> >> solution;
> >> 2 is also great and easy to implement, but IMHO 1 is less difficult to
> >> understand also by people involved in your project;
> >> I don't agree 3 would be the best way, 1 and 2 are more reusable,
> >> moreover involves more dependencies!
> >>
> >> A small question: do you intend to Open Source it? I'd be very very
> >> interested on having a look on it and it would be an excellent iBatis
> >> 3rd part extension.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts.
> >> Simo
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Andrius Juozapaitis <
> andri...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hey guys,
> >> > I created a framework I plan to use for a few projects in-house, using
> >> > ibatis 3. I enjoy the separation of sql, mapping and domain objects,
> but
> >> > I
> >> > have a pretty complex domain model (first class objects may have any
> >> > number
> >> > of attributes, hierarchical if neccessary), so writing sql and taking
> >> > care
> >> > of things like sorting and paging gets really hard, and screws up the
> >> > performance. I tried using apache lucene to take the actual searches
> off
> >> > my
> >> > hands, and it works like a charm. I annotate  the domain objects with
> >> > @Indexable annotations, and pass the mapper name (which is retrieved
> >> > from
> >> > the spring context), that can query the objects from the db, and index
> >> > the
> >> > properties and attributes of the first class objects accordingly *on
> the
> >> > application startup*. This builds an index in memory, and the lucene
> >> > queries
> >> > just return the IDs of the matching documents, sorted and filtered,
> and
> >> > with
> >> > convenient things like totalCount for paging implementation. The
> actual
> >> > data
> >> > can then be retrieved by simply querying by the primary keys from the
> >> > relevant tables.
> >> > Now, there is the issue of how to synchronize the database state with
> >> > the
> >> > lucene index. I see a few ways to implement this:
> >> > 1. Mark the mapper methods that are supposed to change the state of
> the
> >> > database with a marker annotation, and create an aspect that
> intercepts
> >> > those calls, and updates the lucene index.
> >> > This has a nasty side effect, that if someone changes the data in the
> db
> >> > directly, index won't know about it until the application is
> restarted,
> >> > but
> >> > technically, I can live with that.
> >> > 2. Create an aspect, that intercepts certain calls in the Ibatis
> layer,
> >> > and
> >> > depending on the operation at hand (insert, update, delete), updates
> the
> >> > lucene index. Beats annotating the methods, and is semi-automatic. Not
> >> > sure
> >> > at which layer I should intercept this, though - hence, if there's a
> >> > definite place to hang this aspect on, I'm all ears.
> >> > 3. Create database triggers, that would fire the events on
> >> > insert/update/delete using JMS or any other communication mechanism.
> >> > This is
> >> > probably the best way to go (my objects have well defined identities),
> >> > but
> >> > requires a lot of coding, and would kill the performance on
> update-heavy
> >> > operations (imports and such), as the network roundtrip will be
> required
> >> > from app server->db  server->[app server->db server]->app server
> (square
> >> > brackets representing the call of the lucene index update by the
> >> > trigger),
> >> > not to mention the hurdles of setting up JMS producer in postgres
> >> > environment...
> >> > There are probably other ways to implement this - I would be very
> >> > grateful
> >> > if you guys could share your insights on this.
> >> > Thanks in advance,
> >> > Andrius
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-java-unsubscr...@ibatis.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-java-h...@ibatis.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-java-unsubscr...@ibatis.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-java-h...@ibatis.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to