This is all great stuff but if you could please great a ticket//issue
for this and attach the fix to it.  This way we can track it.

Submission form - http://code.google.com/p/mybatis/issues/entry

Nathan

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:10 PM,  <nitin.du...@sungard.com> wrote:
> By default for batch inserts ibatis caches the prepared statements in list
> and always re-uses the last statement for table inserts.  This model works
> for batch inserts for a single table.  However, we have a requirement where
> we need to do batch inserts into several tables in a single transaction.
> Since ibatis is designed for batch inserts to a single table, using multi
> table insert gives us pathetic performance, as ibatis creates a new
> PreparedStatement for every query (occuping database cursor as well).
>
> I looked at the source code and modified SqlExecutor==>addBatch() method.
> This method uses a Map instead of a list.  Corresponding changes are done to
> populate the map and retrieve from map.  Following is the code.
>
>     private Map<String,PreparedStatement> statementMap = new
> HashMap<String,PreparedStatement>();
>
>     public void addBatch(StatementScope statementScope, Connection conn,
> String sql, Object[] parameters) throws SQLException {
>       PreparedStatement ps = null;
>       //if (currentSql != null && currentSql.equals(sql)) {
>       if (currentSql != null && statementMap.containsKey(currentSql)) {
>         //int last = statementList.size() - 1;
>         ps = (PreparedStatement) statementMap.get(currentSql);
>       } else {
>         ps = prepareStatement(statementScope.getSession(), conn, sql);
>         setStatementTimeout(statementScope.getStatement(), ps);
>         currentSql = sql;
>         statementList.add(ps);
>         statementMap.put(currentSql,ps);
>         batchResultList.add(new
> BatchResult(statementScope.getStatement().getId(), sql));
>       }
>       statementScope.getParameterMap().setParameters(statementScope, ps,
> parameters);
>       ps.addBatch();
>       size++;
>     }
>
>     public int executeBatch() throws SQLException {
>       int totalRowCount = 0;
>       Collection<PreparedStatement> psColl = statementMap.values();
>       //for (int i = 0, n = statementList.size(); i < n; i++) {
>       Iterator<PreparedStatement> it = psColl.iterator();
>       //for (int i = 0, n = psColl.size(); i < n; i++) {
>       while(it.hasNext()){
>         //PreparedStatement ps = (PreparedStatement) statementList.get(i);
>        PreparedStatement ps = it.next();
>         int[] rowCounts = ps.executeBatch();
>         for (int j = 0; j < rowCounts.length; j++) {
>           if (rowCounts[j] == Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO) {
>             // do nothing
>           } else if (rowCounts[j] == Statement.EXECUTE_FAILED) {
>             throw new SQLException("The batched statement at index " + j + "
> failed to execute.");
>           } else {
>             totalRowCount += rowCounts[j];
>           }
>         }
>       }
>       return totalRowCount;
>     }
>
> Que: After making these changes everything works for us and the performance
> is very good as it starts using cached PreparedStatements.  Does it look
> like a proper implementation?  Will it have any other impact that I may not
> have seen yet?
>
> -- Nitin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-java-unsubscr...@ibatis.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-java-h...@ibatis.apache.org

Reply via email to