Hi Garry,
No tutorial needed since the way to render as "bmp" is all that is needed
and is in "render options" as well as the manual. Get your models done,
line
up the lights, set your "camera" and render to file as bmp. Tutorial
finished.
Print requirements depend entirely on printing device/machine. The people
who know exactly the optimum file parameters are the people (the
Printers)
who own and run each device. Go to those people for file parameters. This
answer could profitably stop right there but here's some more anyway.
So, render to bmp in RealSoft. Convert to whatever the Printers want or
let
them do so if needed. Render large file sizes since these can be reduced
if
necessary at little or no loss in sharpness (resolution) but small files
can
not be so easily enlarged without image distortions like pixellation,
etc.,
showing.
However don't be scared, if all you have is a small image lifted from a
website then that's all you have. Massage it as much as you can in
Photoshop
or whatever (I use PhotoPaint) and get on with it. The rule is simple
what
you are looking at will be what is printed unless someone messes up and
they
usually dont.
For USA Letter size paper and A4 the usual for Offset is about 300dpi so
files over 25 megs have more than enough information for top results.
DPI means Dots per Inch, it more or less means pixels per inch, therefore
with a calculator in hand you can sort out the dpi for anything you need.
A small confusion might occur if you dig deeper and come across LPI which
is
an old screen ruling term that Platemakers used when converting
photographs
to printed dots. These days just let the Printer worry about this side of
things since there are optimum rulings for each of the machines on his
factory floor plus, if the file is clean enough he might run stochastic
ruling which is fun. A good machine will easily handle 175 lpi but unless
it's newsprint, flexographics (on cartons usually) or silk screen dont
accept anything less than 133 lpi.
A small trick here is a frequency clash that can happen between a printed
image that has been printed using dots (LPI) and the reprinting of a scan
of
that again using dots ... the effect is called moire and can be a horror.
Best to press the "remove moire" button in PhotoShop after scanning
before
handing it over to the Printer ... except they will usually see what's
going
on and fix it or hand it back to you for fixing.
The file size is the total dot/pixel count multiplied by the number of
channels multiplied by the information type in the channels used ... CMYK
used Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black which is four channels and if it is
in
32 bit format then .. etc. RGB used three channels and is generally 24
bit.
Straight "Line Art", or Black and White is One Bit ... so yes, these can
be
very very high resolution with relatively small file sizes ... I usually
run
Line Art files at no less than 600 dpi. Greyscale is generally 8 bit ...
an
8 bit pixel object can carry 256 values of grey from white through to
black.
So, you might want the render to fill an A4, you will render to bmp as
mentioned. Your camera aspect ratio will be 1.41 (if the A4 is portrait
format and 0.71 if it's landscape) ... I use 1.5 and 0.75 so that I can
crop
the image if I want to ... anyway, rough enough. A long edge pixel count
of
8000 is heaps ... which more or less gives 8000 x 5600 total of 44 megs,
almost double the necessary and unless I've been really extravagant with
materials and lights etc the render times are easily sorted over night.
Don't worry about CMYK or RGB since most conversion systems these days
are
good enough and again either shift the file or have the printer do so if
need be. The RealSoft bmp's are RGB and I have only one service house
that
asks me to shift it into CMYK TIFs.
I use High Quality and Press Quality default specifications in Acrobat to
make pdf's a lot. The magazines that my clients advertise in and the
offset
Printers I use all ask for pdf's. These folk will be able to tell you
where
to download their favouirite pdf specs which you run in Acrobat from the
"job option" menu.
Sign writers are all over the place with what they need in file formats
however this is settling down a bit more now except for folk with older
gear.
But if you're doing the side of a truck then treat it as a very very
large
file until the people you end up using to do the job tell you to reduce
(resample) it downwards. Obviously if you can do the image on the truck
at
300dpi then it will look ridiculously sharp (high resolution) but the
file
would be several gigs. On the other hand if you havent rendered it large
enough then the beauty of RealSoft is that you can go back in and
re-render
it at a higher pixel count, no problem ... apart from the additional days
it
might add to the job).
Anyway, as I said at the start, talk to whoever is going to be doing the
Printing, believe me they want you to ask them since they want to be sure
you have every chance to dazzle your clients with a job well done and
this
starts with optimising the file to suit the machines.
I think that's most of the nuts and bolts covered. So far as TV is
concerned
refer to a post at the start of 2004 in reply to my enquiry, it had the
whole story. So far as feature films are concerned ... can anyone shed
light
on that ... nope, I'll just talk to the film folk when I'm ready to get
into
it.
Hope this is in the right direction, sing out if you think I might be
able
to help more.
Neil Cooke
----- Original Message -----
From: "studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: Happy new year grom Germany and good luck for RS Version 6
:-))
and more "beginner" tutorials ;-)
> Hi Neil :
>
> Please forgive my 'top-post' to your elaborate mail . I
> do hope that Realsoft inc takes the time to ponder your sit-
> uation , considering how positive a result you are having
> with your Renderings-To-Print success story .
>
> Myself , and my latest crusade concerning the RS community,
> I think you may have misunderstood .
>
> Let me try to make myself a bit more clear ...
>
> Ok :
>
> 1) You (for instance) do print work .
> 2) Could you not elaborate on taking RS renderings to Print ?
>
> That is to say , could you not write a short tutorial on
> what steps are required to help someone (almost everyone here)
> get their rendered works out to print ?
>
> You know what I mean ... what DPI , what rendered size cor-
> responds to which DPI for which printing process .
>
> What about RGB to CMYK ? What has been your experience ?
>
> This is the kind of stuff that is so important but is very
> simply non-non-non-existent in this community !!!
>
> That's what I'm putting to you ? Could you not enlighten
> us to what kinds of things we should look out for when finally
> deciding to take our work from bits & bytes ... to Print ?(!!)
>
> I think you have a lot to share in this area , Hmmm , unlike
> Rob I don't seem to have the skills to inspire RS users to share
> their particular , current , level of expertise .
>
> Cheers Anyway !!
>
> studio
> www.niagara.com/~studio
> www.studiodynamics.net
>
>
>
>> Hi Garry,
>>
>> What I don't see is a DVD set on getting to grips with RealSoft. I do
>> not
>> learn well from print, from manuals, from tut's. However, if I see
>> someone
>> do the trick it usually sticks. Maybe other peoples workflows would
>> work
>> against someone who could and maybe should head into RS with no safety
>> net I
>> don't know, but an actual voice over ... this button then I hit that
>> thing
>> from there and tweak the dooberry so that the how's your father flicks
>> into
>> focus, etc .... something like that.
>>
>> However, even here I'm doubtful. Not even sure I would have looked at
>> such a
>> thing if one had come packaged with 4.5 when it landed on my desk.
>> Definitely certain there are many who must and should re-invent wheels
>> at
>> every turn. As the saying goes, it might not need re-inventing but the
>> dude
>> sure knows more about wheels.
>>
>> I can not submit tutorials in RS, or any other app I use because I am
>> totally self-taught. My workflows would not stand the light of day. 30
>> seconds on the stage and they'd laugh me right back off into the wings
>> and
>> out the door ... as in ... "Look, this dude has a thirty step work
>> around
>> for the thing that the button second from the left does in one hit?
>> Send
>> him
>> to Jupiter next train!" .....
>>
>> Outside of RS and the apps I use, my expertise is again nowhere near
>> as
>> comprehensive or accurate or useful as even the most basic, but
>> structured,
>> institutional course. More or less works for me but that's as far as
>> it
>> goes, in fact it would more likely be destructive rather than
>> instructive.
>>
>> The problem with individualist artists is that the result is the only
>> criteria. Not how it's achieved. And you can't write a tutorial that
>> smacks
>> a student around the walls a couple of times so they forget all the
>> systems
>> and make a grab for something from right out past the Oort Cloud.
>>
>> RS is freedom for me but it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea.
>> For
>> me
>> maybe the 30 years drawing and scribbling is part of the story, Maybe
>> RS
>> might seem to lack some kind of sounding board for some younger
>> workers.
>>
>> In thirty years I have learnt and forgotten more than a handful of
>> technologies in this trade, maybe one bit of some ridiculous
>> cut-and-paste
>> pipeline will show as useful one afternoon when I'm scratching at a
>> data
>> set
>> but no way would I inflict anyone with the whole trip. Like what we
>> had
>> to
>> do to get tone line with neg film, pos film, mylar sheet or two
>> depending
>> on
>> how thick you want the line, then guess an exposure that takes into
>> account
>> all the extra film layers and press the button ... maybe redo the pos
>> film
>> to slightly one way or the other ... crazy.
>>
>> Maybe my advice ... maybe as a local artist here once reckonned as
>> the
>> way
>> to go: "keep drawing, no matter what".
>>
>> And with the time honoured words: "Dont talk Painter, paint!", I'll
>> get
>> off
>> the pot, except to note that all the old quotes need to be upgraded to
>> RS
>> ... "Dont talk, render dude, render!" ...
>>
>> All the very best for the New Year to you too Garry.
>>
>> Neil Cooke
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: Happy new year grom Germany and good luck for RS Version
>> 6
>> :-))
>> and more "beginner" tutorials ;-)
>>
>>
>> > Hi Neil :
>> >
>> > ... and all the best in 2006 to you and yours !
>> >
>> > OK , let me ask you this ... is there not a single thing
>> > about what you do that could go into an online tutorial ?
>> >
>> > Let's face it , not that many of us know a dime about
>> > 'rendering for print' , right ? Do you know anything on
>> > this topic (Yes is the obvious answer) ?
>> >
>> > OK , so share it !!!
>> >
>> > Give it up people !!! No mercy , no bull , just give up
>> > to the community what skills or knowledge you have worth
>> > sharing .
>> >
>> > Seriously , there may be several people out there that
>> > could very much use the knowledge to get started on their
>> > own Realsoft rendering projects .
>> >
>> > studio
>> > www.niagara.com/~studio
>> > www.studiodynamics.net
>> >
>> >
>> >> A personal view.
>> >>
>> >> My wish list for RS is that I want to know everything that Vesa
>> >> knows
>> >> and
>> >> I
>> >> want to know it now. From high level programming through to each
>> >> and
>> >> every
>> >> run-time object and their parameter sets. That's all.
>> >>
>> >> I believe RS can do everything and more that I would ever want but
>> >> given
>> >> my
>> >> massive lack of knowledge on the subject, I'm not really sure how I
>> >> could
>> >> know that.
>> >>
>> >> Regardless, me and my half a percent depth of understanding, have
>> >> just
>> >> destroyed two weeks very happily. Render number twelve on the
>> >> latest
>> >> drawing. A massive object count and I just added another light
>> >> source
>> >> ...
>> >> but at least this light doesnt need to cast shadows. These are just
>> >> proofing
>> >> renders and have been discarded. They have been taking about ten
>> >> hours
>> >> each
>> >> at about 100 megs or so and the end result if I ever decide I'm
>> >> satisfied
>> >> with the thing will have no commercial value.
>> >>
>> >> Do I have a life outside megabyte-land? Nope and it doesnt worry me
>> >> in
>> >> the
>> >> slightest. A natural born graphics addict ... and my shed here is
>> >> showing
>> >> every sign of falling down around me ... maybe it already has. A
>> >> client
>> >> told
>> >> me I had to mow my lawns ... however the time spent sorting a
>> >> particular
>> >> bump map image I needed had greater priority :]
>> >>
>> >> Actually yes, there a couple of other interests ... food now and
>> >> then
>> >> is
>> >> one
>> >> ... and sometimes I sleep.
>> >>
>> >> Whatever RS decides is useful in V6 is Ok by me, they havent made
>> >> any
>> >> bad
>> >> calls as far as I am concerned. I'm even getting used to the new
>> >> icons.
>> >>
>> >> All the best to List and all for the New Year,
>> >>
>> >> Neil Cooke
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Mark Heuymans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> To: <[email protected]>
>> >> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: Happy new year grom Germany and good luck for RS
>> >> Version
>> >> 6
>> >> :-))
>> >> and more "beginner" tutorials ;-)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For me , as far as V6 is concerned , I just wish I could begin
>> >> >> to
>> >> >>tap the potential of V4.5 !!! We're constantly bombarded by
>> >> >>people
>> >> >>who love to mention that latest and greatest 3D program , but
>> >> >>most
>> >> >>do not realize that RS is capable of so much much more than we
>> >> >>see
>> >> >>here or in forums or IRC etc etc .
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, you hit the nail on its head imho: if I had a choice between
>> >> > A) V6 with tons of new features but incomplete docs, or
>> >> > B) the current V5 but with more complete and better structured
>> >> > docs
>> >> > &
>> >> > tuts
>> >> > I'd go for B in a second!
>> >> >
>> >> > RS keep concentrating on programming and keep ignoring
>> >> > accessibility...
>> >> > but somebody has to do it! OK, I volunteer for a few tuts on
>> >> > landscapes
>> >> > and VSL.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Sorry to be inactive lately; I'm still alive but needed a few
>> >> > weeks
>> >> > without 3d ;)
>> >> >
>> >> > Here's to 2006, cheers to all Realers and Realsoft!
>> >> >
>> >> > -Mark Heuymans
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/183 - Release Date:
>> >> 12/29/2005
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/183 - Release Date:
>> 12/29/2005
>>
>>
>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/183 - Release Date:
12/29/2005
