> But if there is a need for a donation, I'll let you know. > (Some Budweiser are always welcome ;-)
OK , Bud's it is ! > Isn't it better to write an alternate manual? > Pick an item from the manual, which is not well enough > in your opinion, then write a good article how to use > or do it . Yes , maybe you're right . If we had the RS manual up there and people just started changing it or deleting stuff , it would not be very good , especially since it is on a secure site for anyone to view , anyway . > The hackers: > Hmmmm, always a great danger on wiki sites. > How should we avoid this. Any suggestions are welcome. Well , all I can think of is for you to ask everyone to submit a request for editing status . It's a small commun- ity and chances are no one is going to feel deprived if they have to ask you for permission to edit articles . People with 'free' email accounts would then have to submit proof of some kind about who they were . Most hackers would not go through all that trouble , but ded- icated realsoft users would . Anyway , chances are it might not be a problem ,however I was under the impression that the reason we never did this earlier was because of the 'hackers' problem ? > See this: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RC_patrol Makes sense . > Now there is our Wiki, a child of the RS-Users > like the great forum. > Matthias It's awesome ! Thanks again . studio www.niagara.com/~studio www.studiodynamics.net
