No Words :

 Perhaps Your Reply (far-far below) is the Perfect Post to
Place on the Wiki's Tombstone ...

By the way, 'Bizarre' is a very descriptive ... something .

Garry
http://www.killmeplease.com





















































> No, you are correct, I think that only admins like myself and Matthias
> may remove a page completely - the page we are talking about is still
> there. Go to "Special pages->All pages" to see _all_ pages that are on
> the wiki. If an admin completely removes a page, however, it won't
> even appear here and the contents of the page will be lost forever.
> 
> As for extending the "Recent Changes", you can do that yourself by
> clicking the links at the top of the page. There you can increase the
> number of changes to show and how old the changes may be. If the
> numbers presented in there aren't enough, you can modify the URL
> directly:
> 
> http://rs3dwiki.the-final.info/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges&limit=500&days=300
> 
> This will give you the latest 500 changes that are less than 300 days
> old. I suppose that you can exchange 500 and 300 with any number,
> within reason. If you don't want to type this in every time, you can
> bookmark the URL in your browser for easy access.
> 
> If Matthias, as he is the only one with enough access, were to modify
> the PHP code of the Mediawiki to add more links on that page, he would
> make it more difficult to upgrade the wiki when that becomes
> necessary. It is best to minimise the number of such modifications.
> 
> Regards,
> Fredrik Bergholtz
> 
> P.S.
> Note that, on the "All pages" page you can also easily see the
> duplicate pages I was bitching about a long time ago. I think most of
> the duplicates are sorted out, but some may still remain.
























> >   Sorry , I thought only yourself had the means to comp-
> > letely remove a Wiki page . My sincerest apologies .
> >
> >   You also make good points about the pro's & con's of
> > simply copying info into the Wiki from a site that is
> > in a constant state of being upgraded , without foll-
> > owing the S/W's Doc upgrade timetable .
> >
> > Well , could we not extend the timeframe of the 'Recent
> > Changes' tool ? Not fair in my opinion to have an author
> > wondering who and what and why , without at least some
> > small info about the date thier efforts were wiped out .
> >
> >   Of course in theory , anyone can log in and delete the
> > whole site at will , but still , it would be nice to see
> > a few more details concerning particular page histories ,
> > I think .
> >
> > Best .
> >
> > Garry
> > www.parkwild.com
> >
> >
> > > Who are these "non-contributing administrators" you speak of? The page
> > > wasn't removed by any administrator, contributing or otherwise.
> > >
> > > The wiki has mainly contained information about RS3D, not easily found
> > > in the official manual. The wiki was never intended to be a
> > > carbon-copy of the manual since that only raises unnecessary problems
> > > of maintaining consistency. Besides, what would be the point of having
> > > redundant information on the wiki?
> > >
> > > Now, to relate to the greeblez! page, the initial page was, in fact,
> > > the user-manual for Real Greeblez!. This was ok since, at that time,
> > > the script was shipped with no manual and there was no natural "home"
> > > for such a manual. This has changed, Real Greeblez! has a web site of
> > > it's own, this site is linked to from the image contest site and
> > > wikipedia. The Real Greeblez! script now ships with a manual and a
> > > tutorial that shows how to use the script. There is no need for
> > > copying the manual to the wiki, in fact, due to consistency problems,
> > > its presence on the wiki could, theoretically cause more damage than
> > > assistance. This means that the wiki can go back to be about things
> > > _not_ explicitly listed in the official manuals.
> > >
> > > If you want to make a tutorial about performing a specific task, that
> > > maybe nobody even thought about using Real Greeblez! for, feel free to
> > > make a new page for that. But I do not think that an outdated copy of
> > > the manual is helpful at all.
> > >
> > > As a final note, if you had taken the time to look at the page history
> > > you would have noticed that it was Zaug himself who removed the link
> > > to the page. And even though anyone can add and remove things from a
> > > wiki, I think that the author of the product has a little bit more
> > > than others to say about pages concerning his/her product.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Fredrik Bergholtz
> > >
> > > On 07/09/06, studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Oh my, Oww! That is a quite dated version; apparently composed prior 
> > > > > to
> > > > > the complete rewrite/redesign and several additional small changes. It
> > > > > really should be removed if it is not to be updated. In my opinion 
> > > > > that
> > > > > would be rather redundant as Real GreebleZ! has had proper, up to 
> > > > > date,
> > > > > documentation since May; available at the source.
> > > >
> > > > http://rs3dwiki.the-final.info/index.php?title=Real_GreebleZ%21
> > > >
> > > > I looked for my page (above) on the wiki some time ago with the
> > > > intention of updating it . Couldn't find it , so I gave up .
> > > >
> > > > If the page is that offensive , it could have easily been up-
> > > > dated by deleting the nasty redundant content and add a link
> > > > to http://www.catmtn.com/realgreeblez "for-up-to-date-Doc's" .
> > > >
> > > >   That's the whole idea behind the wiki impetus . Edit , add ,
> > > > delete page content , modify ... perfect ! (verb) . It was not
> > > > designed to give non-contributing administrators an opportunity
> > > > to decide what should be and what should not .
> > > >
> > > > Oh well , such is life , n'est pas ?
> > > >
> > > > > Zaug
> > > >
> > > > Garry
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/401 - Release Date: 7/26/2006
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/401 - Release Date: 7/26/2006
> 
>

Reply via email to