I'll check them out -- I didn't know that Xara could do 16-bit images, and
in all honesty I'd forgotten about Idruna entirely. :)

Thanks :)

-----------------------------
Rakesh Malik
My Web Site: http://www.whitecranephotography.com
Blog: http://tamerlin.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/baratheon
Sent from Seattle, Washington, United States

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Matthias Kappenberg <[email protected]
> wrote:

>  Hi Rakesh,
>
> my 5 Cents:
> http://www.xara.com/us/
> The *PRO can import 16bit images.
>
> and:
> http://www.idruna.com/photogenicshdr.html
> (8,16,32bit)
>
> and (one of my favourite software-companies):
> http://mediachance.com/realdraw/index.html
> in conjunction with
> http://mediachance.com/dap/dap2.html
> to convert the 16bit images after color adjustments
> to 8bit psd, tif or whatever....
>
> Maybe not exactly what fits in your needs
> but nice apps in my opinion.
>
> Matthias
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Neil Cooke <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2009 11:04 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Is Realsoft the only real 3D solution on Linux?
>
> @ Rakesh
>
> >Photoshop is also the only app out there right now that will load   500MB
> 16-bit images (though some of the scans have approached 2 GB
>
> My renders for the mural size prints at 20,000 pixels etc, have meant over
> 500 GB file sizes. I have not come to any limits with my Corel Photopaint in
> handling these files.
>
> For one series I was shifting the colours into sepia but not by simply
> tweaking the balance but rather by over laying the colour copy onto a sepia
> tinted greyscale and adjusting transparency.
>
> Neil Cooke
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Andrew Berge <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Monday, December 28, 2009 10:28 AM
> *Subject:* RE: Is Realsoft the only real 3D solution on Linux?
>
> Rakesh,
>
> There is cine paint the film version of gimp which can support upto 32bit
> images and was developed specifically for use on film projects:
>
> http://www.cinepaint.org/
>
> I haven't looked at it in quite a while, last I looked it was only just
> released and needed more development but perhaps by now it is more complete
> and may be useful for you.
>
> rgds,
>
> Andrew
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rakesh Malik
> *Sent:* Monday, 28 December 2009 2:42 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Is Realsoft the only real 3D solution on Linux?
>
> Lightroom is only a partial solution for my needs; it's sufficient for my
> digital images, but it doesn't hold up with my big ones, and cleaning up
> dust spots and scratches on film scans is a LOT easier with Photoshop than
> with Lightroom, even with LR's new brush tools. :(
>
> Photoshop is also the only app out there right now that will load   500MB
> 16-bit images (though some of the scans have approached 2 GB, I cut back on
> the size because I only have 4 GB on my machine right now...). There are
> some compositing packages that would probably be just as capable as
> Photoshop, but they're all more expensive, and all of the ones that are
> available for Linux are a LOT more expensive :(
>
> -----------------------------
> Rakesh Malik
> My Web Site: http://www.whitecranephotography.com
> Blog: http://tamerlin.blogspot.com
> http://www.flickr.com/baratheon
> Sent from Seattle, Washington, United States
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Zaug <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Rakesh Malik wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, there's nothing comparable to Photoshop for Linux that's
>>> in my price range right now... the Gimp just doesn't cut it for my
>>> photography.
>>>
>> It is not Photoshop and is not a part of my photography workflow, but I
>> understand that Lightroom meets the needs of most (many pro) photographers.
>> It installed and ran well for me under Virtualbox; on a 64bit amd dual core
>> and 3 gigs of RAM.
>>
>> I use to software that came with my alpha 850 and 900 cameras for initial
>> color correction and dynamic range enhancement (it does this better than
>> anything else I have tried, including LR); I run it under wine, but had to
>> install it under VB first, then was a simple matter of moving the
>> application to wine's windows folder. Running under wine instead of VB saves
>> whatever memory you have alloted to your VB machine (about 1.25gig in my
>> case), besides what the app actually requires. I realize that is getting
>> close to the tweaking you speak of, but it only has to be done when
>> installing the app. This method of installing under VB and moving to wine
>> has worked for a few other applications, but not for all that I have tried;
>> definitely worth checking for apps you run often under VB.
>>
>> I will also mention that Noise Ninja is available in a native Linux
>> version; it _is_ part of my workflow - > does a fantastic job and is very
>> reasonably priced.
>>
>> I guess that my HW and networking requirements are minimal, but a couple
>> of the main reasons I am running Linux are that I very much like the
>> advanced, journalling (apparently bulletproof) file systems available under
>> Linux and of course it's small system footprint.
>>
>> CheerZ!,
>> Zaug
>>
>>
>>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.120/2588 - Release Date: 12/26/09
> 19:02:00
>
>

Reply via email to