On 09/12/2009 04:39, "Boris Kraft" <[email protected]> wrote:
> But what about modules? If I built a Magnolia module that would be > distributed on its own, but needs Magnolia to run and uses / links to > Magnolia libraries / jars - could that be distributed under a closed > source license? I believe you can write modules that have any license you want as long as they are not distributed with Magnolia, but this is not a binding legal agreement. The GPL is the only binding agreement. I suggest you talk to a lawyer that understands the implications of GPL. I am no lawyer, but from what I understand of the GPL licence, if you link to a GPL library/software, your code is automatically under the GPL. ---------------------------------------------------------------- For list details see http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> ----------------------------------------------------------------
