Thanks Gregor,

I see your position. Perhaps one of the key points in building a product is 
that 
you do not (want to) control the diversity of target environments. So its 
natural to make such assumptions so long as you "believe" they would be 
accepted/benefited by majority of your users. Since I, as an user is at the 
receiving end who would have to customize the install scripts for each 
third-party webapp to exclude such jars, it does add a little overhead during 
installation for each webapp.

Just another perspective,
Mrinal



________________________________
From: Grégory Joseph <[email protected]>
To: Magnolia User-List <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 9:18:51 PM
Subject: Re: [magnolia-user]  mail.jar and Axis SOAP clients = Problems


Welcome Mrinal,

Thanks for the insights, makes sense indeed. Seems to me, though, that this is 
something of a semi-advanced level; I'd rather get a few savvy users have to 
knowingly remove (or use a maven-dependency-exclusion) the mail and activation 
jars, than scare away newcomers with obscure NoClassDefFoundError s - wdyt ?

-g

On Jul 29, 2010, at 17:45, Mrinal Kanti wrote:

> Actually it depends on the scenario. Whether you are using Tomcat or if you 
> are 
>using any other Application Server like WebLogic or Websphere. Most app 
>servers 
>these days ship with the mail (and activation) jars in their server classpath 
>which allows them to configure/manage mail Session as a resource independent 
>of 
>the webapps. Tomcat keeps things simple and less sophisticated. So it allows a 
>possibility were you may not need to externally manage Java mail Session.
> 
> Nevertheless, I see a few reasons for putting the java mail jars in server 
>classpath (if your app server does not provide it).
> 
> 1) It allows for the JNDI configuration for java mail Session (like JDBC). 
> This 
>is probably beneficial in scenarios where one would like to configure the mail 
>session at a server level. The server classloader cannot access a jar from the 
>webapp classloader. But if the mail jar is ALSO present in webapp then it 
>presents a risk as the Session class is loaded by both server and webapp 
>classloaders, so the webapp classloader may complain that the instance loaded 
>by 
>the server does not belong to the class loaded by the child (webapp) 
>classloader.
> 
> 2) Low overhead for the webapp classloader if it has to maintain (load or 
>unload) the Java Mail classes on a per webapp basis. I often have to run my 
>apps 
>on a VPS environment which constrains me on both CPU and memory fronts
> 
> Besides, JavaMail has not gone through any significant changes in the recent 
>past, so it would be a safe risk to assume that any recently developed webapps 
>would be using the latest version, thereby eliminating the risk of version 
>mismatch at the server class loader level.
> 
> Just my 2 cents along with my first post,
> -Mrinal
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Grégory Joseph <[email protected]>
> To: Magnolia User-List <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 8:10:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [magnolia-user] mail.jar and Axis SOAP clients = Problems
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 29, 2010, at 16:16, Unger, Richard wrote:
> 
> > Hello Everyone!
> >  
> > I was just trying to integrate a (Axis-1.4 based) SOAP client into my 
>TemplateModel class, and was having problems with ClassNotFoundExceptions for 
>javax.mail.* classes.
> >  
> > The reason is that magnolia includes “mail-1.4.1.jar” in the WEB-INF/lib 
>Directory of the magnolia webapps.
> > However, recent versions of Tomcat will refuse to load classes coming from 
>the packages java.* or javax.* via the webapp classloader. JARs including such 
>classes must be placed in $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib to avoid problems.
> 
> Do you know since which version this is the case ? I've deployed quite a few 
>Magnolia instances under Tomcat 6 instances without issues. AFAIK (but I might 
>be outdated), the only forbidden packages in webapps are the servlet and jsp 
>ones.
> 
> -g
> 
> 
> >  
> > Moving mail-1.4.1.jar from the WEB-INF/lib to common/lib solves the problem.
> >  
> > I don’t know whether this is really a bug (since other Servlet Containers 
> > may 
>not have this restriction), but perhaps it would be better to move the 
>mail.jar 
>in the magnolia-tomcat-bundle release…
> >  
> > Regards from Vienna,
> > 
> > Richard Unger
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > For list details see
> > http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
> > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> For list details see
> http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> For list details see
> http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------
For list details see
http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
For list details see
http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to