We have customers using both. The oracle 10 is better and easier then oracle 9 to connect. Apart from that there are no significant issue with ORAs. There were in the past fewer issues with DB or repo corruption with Oracle then with MySQL pbly also due to fact that oracle doesn't mind long living connections that JR prefers). When using Oracle performance of the OCI drivers was bettern then thin drivers.
HTH, Jan On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:09 AM, SeanMcTex wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > Our institution is making a push toward using Oracle all over the place. > We've been using MySQL as our substrate under the JCR for Magnolia for > several years now, but are interested to know whether a move to Oracle would > make our lives better or worse in any significant way. > > Has anybody had experience with both? If so, could you provide any insight > you have on the relative merits of each? We're particularly interested in > performance, maintenance, etc. > > Thanks for any insight. > > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Oracle-vs.-MySQL-tp29731384p29731384.html > Sent from the Magnolia - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > For list details see > http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- - Best regards, Jan Haderka, PhD. Magnolia International Ltd. http://www.magnolia-cms.com You should join us at Magnolia Conference 2010: http://www.magnolia-cms.com/conference http://twitter.com/magnolia_cms http://facebook.com/Magnolia -------------------------------------- Magnolia® - Simple Open-Source Content Management ---------------------------------------------------------------- For list details see http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> ----------------------------------------------------------------
