Hi Greg,

On Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, Grégory Joseph wrote:
> Hey Jörg,
> 
> On 01 Feb 2011, at 21:29, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >> <...>
> >> desired version and hence complains. Should be enough to adapt the
> >> stk-dependency in your module descriptor to <version>1.4.2</version> or
> >> maybe something like <version>1.4/*</version>.
> > 
> > Shhhhhhhh, OK, got it. I thought that updating the POM is enough, but I
> > forgot that module descriptor ... I'm tempted to filter it as resource
> > ;-)
> 
> Yeah, that's sometimes a pita. Maven-filtering might work, but I'm afraid
> the range syntax in Maven is different than ours (albeit much more
> comprehensive). I've laid down a few ideas to write a Maven plugin that
> would completely generate the module descriptors (MAGNOLIA-3518), and now
> I wonder if we should adopt the Maven (and OSGI, iirc) notation for
> version ranges, or have that plugin "transform" them into our much more
> limited notation.
> 
> Thoughts ?

Actually I decoupled it now completetly. Since I do not want to release the 
module for each SNAPSHOT, I've started with own patch numbers to trigger the 
bootstrap.

- Jörg


----------------------------------------------------------------
For list details see
http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to