While I agree that multiple subscribers would be nice I would guess that 90% of 
all small sites don't have a fail-over system implemented. In fact, most of 
them won't even have a separation between author and public.

Then again this would be an exceptional selling proposition for Magnolia where 
it would beat most of it's competitors hands down... Definitely something to 
take into account when taking that decision.

-will

On 13.09.2011, at 18:06, Rakesh Vidyadharan wrote:

> 
> By and large the changes are fine except the decision to constrain CE
> users to just one subscriber.  Everyone including small sites need
> fail-over capability.  One of the clinching factors that lead us to select
> Magnolia when we were evaluating CMS options was multiple subscribers.
> 
> Rakesh
> 
> On 09/09/2011 09:34, "Grégory Joseph" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Following my email announcing 4.5 yesterday, here is another, less
>> time-constrained, topic which we want to expose and discuss.
>> 
>> There's an old itch that Magnolia, as a company, has wanted to scratch
>> for a while:  we need to have a clearer distinction between the community
>> and the enterprise editions of Magnolia. It's always been a struggle
>> explaining what was different, and why.
>> 
>> We've talked to various community members, partners, customers; we've
>> looked at what we have now and where the differences are, and realized
>> that we can indeed streamline and simplify them. And in helping
>> clarifying the distinction between the editions, we think we can drive
>> the development of *both* editions of the product further.
>> 
>> Our current plan is to turn the following points into enterprise features:
>> * Multiple subscribers
>> * Multiple sites (this is already the case, as implemented with ETK)
>> * Workflow - at some point in the future, we will migrate to a new
>> workflow engine, and this new module will most likely be EE-only.
>> 
>> The rationale here being that, quite simply, those are features that are
>> primarily used by larger enterprises.
>> 
>> Conversely, we're looking into at least the following changes for the
>> community edition:
>> * STK's license changes to GPL. No more badge. We thought it was just
>> time to get rid of that barrier. We're now hoping for a broader STK user
>> base and eco system !
>> * The imaging module goes to CE (GPL, open source and bundled with STK)
>> - no more silly non-resized images with CE.
>> * The commenting module will also go CE. This hasn't been discussed
>> much just yet, but I assume you'll still have the choice to use an
>> external commenting if you wish, but it just makes sense to have this
>> module along side the forum module, which it depends on.
>> 
>> These are the main current plans, anyway. Other changes or ideas are not
>> out of the question, with the 2 main goals of streamlining the
>> differences, keeping them where they make sense from a business
>> perspective, all the while allowing greater adoption and participation
>> with the product we all love.
>> 
>> In terms of schedule, STK 2.0, which will come with Magnolia 4.5, will
>> have its license changed. Other changes are currently not scheduled
>> precisely, so we're perhaps looking at making those other changes for 5.0.
>> 
>> We realize these changes might bum some people out, but we also think
>> they will rejoice others; and that in general, it's a decision that will
>> help driving the product forward. As always, we look forward to your
>> feedback and will be happy to discuss or clarify points as needed.
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>> Grégory Joseph
>> Magnolia International Ltd.
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [email protected]            http://www.magnolia-cms.com
>> Magnolia® CMS - Simple Open-Source Content Management
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> For list details see
>> http://www.magnolia-cms.com/community/mailing-lists.html
>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> For list details see
> http://www.magnolia-cms.com/community/mailing-lists.html
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 



----------------------------------------------------------------
For list details see
http://www.magnolia-cms.com/community/mailing-lists.html
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to