#: Michael Mertel changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  10/10/2005 
1:27 PM :#
Hi Alex,

because it's a well known problem ... wouldnt it be nice for magnolia
(advanved) newbies to build magnolia without any tricks?
Isn't it possible to have a managed repository by Magnolia for all
related files? It seems so that the dependency on 3rd parties can cause
trouble, at least for maven newbies like me.

Just my $.02.

--Michael



Indeed this would be the best solution from my pov too. There is already a maven repository hosted by Magnolia. However, there may be problems with hosting downloads for special jars (I am not sure about this).

we will further investigate this,

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [magnolia-user] maven build - dependency


#: Michael Mertel changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/6/2005 6:01 PM :#
> Hi,
> > if I have a clean maven repository and try to compile the latest SVN > snapshot ... I always got some dependency problems. At least with the > activation package, the jars are not in javax.activation (requested in > magnolia, magnolia-core) on magnolia.sourceforge.net/repository nor in > www.ibiblio.org/maven. > > I can compile without any problem if I put the needed files on my > local apache and use this as another maven.repo.remote. > > Should this be fixed in the SVN? Is it a bug ? ... or is it just me > silly know-nothing maven newbie ? This only happens if you don't have > the needed files already in your maven repo. > > --Michael > Please check this thread: http://webmail.magnolia.info/Lists/dev-list/Message/4591.html

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.



----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to