(Boris Kraft) wrote:
On 28.12.2005, at 21:57, (Michael Wechner) wrote:
thanks. Just being curious, but why did you found a wholly owned
subsidiary
of obinary to govern the Magnolia project? It seems to me that since
"Magnolia Inc" is a wholly owned subsidiary of obinary, you could
also have
used obinary itself. Well, on second thought it probably makes sense
for legal reasons, in case somebody is suing Magnolia Inc because of
licensing or whatever reasons. Or what other reasons are there?
Please don't get me wrong, I am not up to something ;-) but just
curious/interested what the reasoning for the different models are.
Maybe you should step aboard the next train to Basel and we have a
chat here - you know where our offices are located ...
Initially it was for legal reasons, just like you suggested. As an
added bonus, the we try to regard obinary as a (privileged) partner,
to make room for other partners. And you never know how all of this
develops ... maybe the role of "magnolia inc" will be a different one
one day.
But seriously Michi, next time you are in Basel please drop by!
thanks for the invitation :-)
Michi
- Boris
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
