On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:02 PM, David Fernández <da...@dit.upm.es> wrote:
> Finally I managed to do the git bisect with your indications. The result:
>
> # git bisect bad
> 026cee0086fe1df4cf74691cf273062cc769617d is the first bad commit
> commit 026cee0086fe1df4cf74691cf273062cc769617d
> Author: Pawel Moll <pawel.m...@arm.com>
> Date:   Mon Mar 26 12:50:51 2012 +1030
>
>    params: <level>_initcall-like kernel parameters
>
>    This patch adds a set of macros that can be used to declare
>    kernel parameters to be parsed _before_ initcalls at a chosen
>    level are executed.  We rename the now-unused "flags" field of
>    struct kernel_param as the level.  It's signed, for when we
>    use this for early params as well, in future.
>
>    Linker macro collating init calls had to be modified in order
>    to add additional symbols between levels that are later used
>    by the init code to split the calls into blocks.
>
>    Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.m...@arm.com>
>    Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au>

Interesting.
Reverting this commit makes the problem go away?

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to