On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Martin Pärtel <martin.par...@gmail.com> wrote: > UML guest processes now get correct siginfo_t for SIGTRAP, SIGFPE, > SIGILL and SIGBUS. Specifically, si_addr and si_code are now correct > where previously they were si_addr = NULL and si_code = 128. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Pärtel <martin.par...@gmail.com>
Do we really need the _ignore_siginfo wrappers? Can't you add siginto to all handlers (where it's needed) and set it to NULL if the information is not available/used. -- Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
