On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:43:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdun...@xenotime.net> wrote: > On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdun...@xenotime.net> > > wrote: > >> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> > >>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: > >>>> How about this then? > >>>> > >>>> David > >>>> --- > >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >>>> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 > >>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >>>> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT > >>>> config X86_32 > >>>> def_bool !64BIT > >>>> select HAVE_AOUT > >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL > >>>> > >>>> config X86_64 > >>>> def_bool 64BIT > >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA > >>>> > >>>> config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM > >>>> def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT > >>> > >>> Looks sane. > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> > >> > >> > >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@xenotime.net> > > > > Thanks, folded into David's original patch. > > > When will this be fixed in linux-next? > > linux-next of 20120821 still fails.
Should be in latest, ie. 20120822. Cheers, Rusty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
