On Tuesday 07 December 2004 05:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gerd, I've sent this to you since you've been working on the terminal-cleanup. You might as well get some ideas from this one - and it or some cleaned-up version will be merged for 2.6.11.
Bye P.S.: I've not yet got an answer about your general-protection-fault patch and the issues I raised up. What about that? > If UML wants to open an xterm channel and the xterm does not run properly > (eg. terminates soon after starting) we will get a hang (a comment added in > the patch explains why). > > This avoids the most common cause for this and adds a comment (which long > term will go away with a rewrite of that code); the complete fix would be > to catch the xterm process dying, up(&data->sem), and -EIO all requests > from that point onwards. > > That applies for some of the other channels too, so part of the code should > probably be abstracted a little and generalized. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (modified) Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
