poking around a bit - i wonder why there are headers under the arch/um/include directory when we have a perfectly good seperate include/asm-um area to play in?
things that want to build against a set of kernel headers shouldn't know about the arch, right? they should be able to follow UML include paths that are setup during the build stage that does the soft linking of asm and such.
unimportant compared to the scope of 2.6 work i understand, but i thought i'd bring it up and see if you think i'm way off my rocker or if i have a point.
thank you all for keeping at it. -- db
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
