> Roland McGrath:
> 
>   o fix bogus ECHILD return from wait* with zombie group leader
> 
> I'm not sure this is the fix, but it is possible indeed, given that the 
> problem UML triggered was, IIRC, that when it exited, there wasn't a proper 
> cleanup of the status, and the process became invisible but still kept a 
> reference to the file in /tmp, preventing it from being deleted...

Yep, that makes sense.  The race thing also explains why it doesn't
allways happen.  I still can't reproduce it on my machine btw, so it's
hard for me to test whenever that really fixes it or not.

> I think you can search for it on linux.bkbits.net... I'll do that when I have 
> time...

Attached below for reference.

  Gerd

# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
#   2004/12/17 09:18:41-08:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
#   [PATCH] fix bogus ECHILD return from wait* with zombie group leader
#   
#   Klaus Dittrich observed this bug and posted a test case for it.
#   
#   This patch fixes both that failure mode and some others possible.  What
#   Klaus saw was a false negative (i.e.  ECHILD when there was a child)
#   when the group leader was a zombie but delayed because other children
#   live; in the test program this happens in a race between the two threads
#   dying on a signal.
#   
#   The change to the TASK_TRACED case avoids a potential false positive
#   (blocking, or WNOHANG returning 0, when there are really no children
#   left), in the race condition where my_ptrace_child returns zero.
#   
#   Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#   Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#   Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# 
# kernel/exit.c
#   2004/12/17 00:09:08-08:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] +13 -2
#   fix bogus ECHILD return from wait* with zombie group leader
# 
diff -Nru a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
--- a/kernel/exit.c     2005-01-10 14:00:38 +01:00
+++ b/kernel/exit.c     2005-01-10 14:00:38 +01:00
@@ -1319,6 +1319,10 @@
 
        add_wait_queue(&current->wait_chldexit,&wait);
 repeat:
+       /*
+        * We will set this flag if we see any child that might later
+        * match our criteria, even if we are not able to reap it yet.
+        */
        flag = 0;
        current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
        read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -1337,11 +1341,14 @@
 
                        switch (p->state) {
                        case TASK_TRACED:
-                               flag = 1;
                                if (!my_ptrace_child(p))
                                        continue;
                                /*FALLTHROUGH*/
                        case TASK_STOPPED:
+                               /*
+                                * It's stopped now, so it might later
+                                * continue, exit, or stop again.
+                                */
                                flag = 1;
                                if (!(options & WUNTRACED) &&
                                    !my_ptrace_child(p))
@@ -1377,8 +1384,12 @@
                                                goto end;
                                        break;
                                }
-                               flag = 1;
 check_continued:
+                               /*
+                                * It's running now, so it might later
+                                * exit, stop, or stop and then continue.
+                                */
+                               flag = 1;
                                if (!unlikely(options & WCONTINUED))
                                        continue;
                                retval = wait_task_continued(


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to