On Tuesday 01 February 2005 01:47 am, Frank Sorenson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Doug Dumitru wrote: > <snip> > > | With 2.6.9 skas3 v8 a plain kill does nothing. With a kill -9, 3 of the > | four thread die, but one remains and the only way to get rid of it is > | with a server reboot. > | > | Not sure what is going on here, but I have not been able to get anything > | past 2.6.7 to work while killing virtual rudely. > > Will they die if you send a "kill -CONT" followed by the "kill -9"? > > Frank
If a kill -9 needs to be followed by a CONT signal to actually take effect on a stopped process, why is this not a kernel bug? (Kill -9 is supposed to _mean_ it. I've always thought of it as the "with shotgun" option...) Rob ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
