[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I've the doubt that the addition would better go under sys-i386 or
> some other  subarch-dependent directories (in a file compiled against
> kernelspace  headers, i.e. not listed in USER_OBJS in the directory
> it's contained  inside), and it'd be nice to add also the x86_64
> version. 

Yes, good point.

                                Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to