On Saturday 05 March 2005 20:45, Jeff Dike wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without > > TT mode and WITHOUT static build it still fails with the same problem > > (__bb_init_func problem I already reported). But compiling without TT > > but WITH static build the __bb_init_func problem goes away but instead > > I get a __gcov_init missing symbol in my modules. > > > > Note I have gcc-3.3.4-11 (SuSE 9.2) and it defines __gcov_init. So I > > added this as an export symbol and lo and behold the kernel and > > modules compiled and I am now up an running with UML and NTFS as a > > module. (-: > > Can you try this patch? It exports either __gcov_init or __bb_init_func > depending on your gcc version. a) wrong because you say __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 4 rather than >= b) wrong because for he the link failed on __bb_init_func at the beginning. So in the case you need to export BOTH symbols.
-- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
