Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not convinced about the practicality of converting all static > initialisations to code-based initialisations though
This is the first one I recall seeing. All the other conversions were replacing static spinlock_t lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; with static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); and replacing { lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } with { spin_lock_init(lock); } ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel