Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I'm not convinced about the practicality of converting all static
>  initialisations to code-based initialisations though

This is the first one I recall seeing.  All the other conversions were replacing

        static spinlock_t lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;

with
        static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);

and replacing

        {
                lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
        }

with

        {
                spin_lock_init(lock);
        }



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to