On Tuesday 22 March 2005 22:30, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Blaisor,
>
> Perhaps the error message should be changed from:
>
> "add_arg: Too much command line!\n"
>
> to something like:
>
> "add_arg: Too many command line arguments!\n"
>
> Does this explain the error more clearly? Or am I mistaken?
Yes, I was copying it and didn't notice the message didn't make sense.
Here is the patch, it's queued and will be sent shortly.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Anthony Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Replace the message with a more meaningful one. Noted by Anthony Brock.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c~uml-correct-message arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
--- linux-2.6.11/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c~uml-correct-message 2005-03-24 03:04:59.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c 2005-03-24 03:05:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ char command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE] = {
void add_arg(char *arg)
{
if (strlen(command_line) + strlen(arg) + 1 > COMMAND_LINE_SIZE) {
- printf("add_arg: Too much command line!\n");
+ printf("add_arg: Too many command line arguments!\n");
exit(1);
}
if(strlen(command_line) > 0)
_
