On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:55 pm, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Speaking of which, I ask this from time to time: > > > > What's the minimal patch set that _just_ adds -SKAS0 mode to something > > like a 2.6.11 kernel? I'd like to try it out, but every time I sit down > > to whack at it my interest budget runs out sifting through a mountain of > > unrelated x86-64 patches to try to figure out what exactly I need to > > apply to get just SKAS0... > > Also, I forgot: during your development work use SKAS. It doesn't give any > big difference visible inside the Virtual Machine (except for bugs).
I'm trying out the build on various different systems: knoppix, red hat, suse, debian. In some cases running on borrowed machines, in other cases running on a knoppix boot cd. (I care because I'm using the host tools, which vary slightly from system to system.) You just suggested that I replace the kernels on all of these systems, (including other people's machines, and the bootable CD that uses a kernel with the cloop patch applied and an initramfs that's hard to extract) with a different kernel. Just so I'm testing something faster that's not actually what I'm going to be deploying. If I was going to replace the host kernel and run on a modified system, I'd just A) replace it with the version I actually need, B) run the build as root and use chroot instead of UML. I'm interested in SKAS0 because it's potentially deployable. Any SKAS that requires a modified host kernel is not, for my purposes. Rob ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
