On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:57, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > >>Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to > >>UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files. > >>These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64. > > > > I merged these, except for the restartnointr one because I don't have > > ERESTARTNOINTR in my /usr/include, inside a #ifdef KERNEL or not. > > > > Jeff > > That's bad. Do you have any suggestions how to solve this? Add it to the compilation-generated header files (the output of mk_constants, mk_thread and such), so we catch it from the definition given by ourselves and expose to the whole of UML. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
