On Wednesday 20 April 2005 03:51, Ian McDonald wrote:
> > Comments inline


> > Also, tried compiling UML itself on a real 32-bit box (with static
> > linking, obviously)?
>
> Yes - work.
What I really meant was whether that UML, compiled on that environemnt, works 
in that situation - however this is no more relevant, since it was solved the 
other way.

> Yes I did succeed on my 32 bit Woody but that machine is being turned
> off in next couple of weeks :-(

> The UML appears now to be working (once I can do more tests) on 64 bit
> once host kernel was upgraded to 2.6.11.7 (guess is 2.6.11.4+bs4 32
> bit).

> Thanks for your help. Unfortunately I don't have much time to help
> write patches at present or too many tests as my UML testing has
> slowed down my project and I have acquired two dedicated machines to
> help me out... I will certainly try to help though whenever I get
> bored (which is quite often!)
Ok, don't worry and thanks a lot!
Good bye
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to