On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:26:47PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > That's because that stuff is not merged yet. Speaking of which, where does > > the current UML tree live and who should that series be Cc'ed to? > > My patchset lives at http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html, and things > like this should be CC-ed to me. > > > I've got a decent split-up and IMO that should be mergable. Patches are > > on ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/viro/UM*; summary in the end of mail. > > That's a sanitized and split version of old UML-kbuild patch. > > Thanks, merged into my tree. It'll be visible at the above URL next time > I push the site out, and I'll merge this and a bunch of other stuff to > Linus and Andrew shortly.
OK... Out of old UML-kbuild only the chunk in ptrace.c is not covered by that (note that e.g. top-level Makefile is not modified at all in the new version). arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c is a separate story - we need per-arch helper there. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
