On Tuesday 03 May 2005 01:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > These are some trivial fixes for the x86-64 subarch module support. The > > only potential problem is that I have to modify > > arch/x86_64/kernel/module.c, to avoid copying the whole of it. > > > > I can't use it verbatim because it depends on a special vmalloc-like area > > for modules, which for now (maybe that's to fix, I guess not) UML/x86-64 > > has not. I went the easy way and reused the i386 vmalloc()-based > > allocator. > > Why is this "for -mm" and not for -linus? That's a report on the current "review/testing" status, in this case because I wanted an ACK from Andi Kleen. Which acked it for himself but warned about the possible breakage for other archs. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso" Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
